Dear Neeravbhai, Sonal & Bill, I've put this picture as a symbol, not of a particular person, because nobody can identify the little poor girl child, again because her face covered with hairs.
it is sickening to revisit the scene and i wouldn't do that just to reply to your rebuttal.
just because the poor girl child is faceless and not easily identifiable as a particular person, you'll take liberty to capture her nudity from the angle that can help justify your caption?
you also think poor people have no dignity to preserve and protect?
your pleading that 'this picture' is used 'as a symbol' makes a poor defense.
when i searched google with the tag 'poverty gujarat', out of 60,000 results, i found only one photo and that is sleeping poverty. rest photographs belong to anil ambanis and others. this speaks volumes on gujarat tradition, media, their apathy towards poor. and even person like umsh decides to expose poverty, he chooses a nude girl!!!!!! no words.
ohh!! great capture. umesh, it gives you name and shame to us. ranmal
ReplyDeletei'm sorry, i couldn't look any longer and felt you are violating the modesty of the little poor girl child who is quite unaware of her exposure
ReplyDeleteand not only enjoy yourself the angle that capture partial nudity but invite others also to feast as pedophile!
i may agree with RANMAL : for you it is a hunt for name, for us sensitive viewers it is shame!
Hey
ReplyDeleteI agree with Ranmal and Neerav.
You could better cover her with a cloth instead of clicking a pic.
Request you to remove the pic asap.
Hi Umesh Bhai, You mean Well But Please Remove this Picture, I Know You Have good intention.
ReplyDeleteઉમેશ, આ ફોટો એક લાખ શબ્દોની ગરજ સારે છે. ધન્યવાદ.
ReplyDeleteDear Neeravbhai, Sonal & Bill,
ReplyDeleteI've put this picture as a symbol, not of a particular person, because nobody can identify the little poor girl child, again because her face covered with hairs.
photo ni mariyada nu dhyn rahyu chhe. te babat birdavi rahi.....
ReplyDeleteit is sickening to revisit the scene and i wouldn't do that just to reply to your rebuttal.
ReplyDeletejust because the poor girl child is faceless and not easily identifiable as a particular person, you'll take liberty to capture her nudity from the angle that can help justify your
caption?
you also think poor people have no dignity to preserve and protect?
your pleading that 'this picture' is used 'as a symbol' makes a poor defense.
Umeshbhai realy i Touch........
ReplyDeleteIt is shameful, after 67 years the India became Independent!!!
ReplyDeletewhen i searched google with the tag 'poverty gujarat', out of 60,000 results, i found only one photo and that is sleeping poverty. rest photographs belong to anil ambanis and others. this speaks volumes on gujarat tradition, media, their apathy towards poor. and even person like umsh decides to expose poverty, he chooses a nude girl!!!!!! no words.
ReplyDeletei think those who see paedophilia in this photo are potential paedophiles themselves. i saw the poverty and nothing more
ReplyDelete